PureInsight | January 28, 2007

PITTSBURGH - For decades, many scientists have criticized string

theory, pointing out that it does not make predictions by which it can

be tested. Now, researchers at Carnegie Mellon University; the

University of California, San Diego; and The University of Texas at

Austin have developed a test of string theory. Their test, described in

the Jan. 26 Physical Review Letters,

involves measurements of how elusive high-energy particles scatter

during particle collisions. Most physicists believe that collisions

will be observable at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), which is set to

turn on later this year at the European Laboratory for Particle

Physics, commonly known as CERN.

"Our work shows that, in principle, string theory can be tested in a

nontrivial way," explained Ira Rothstein, co-author of the paper and

professor of physics at Carnegie Mellon.

Rothstein and colleagues Jacques Distler, professor of physics at The

University of Texas at Austin; Benjamin Grinstein, professor of physics

at the University of California, San Diego; and Carnegie Mellon

graduate student Rafael Porto developed their test based on studies of

how strongly W bosons scatter in high-energy particle collisions

generated within a particle accelerator. W bosons are special because

they carry a property called the weak force, which provides a

fundamental way for particles to interact with one another.

When the LHC turns on later this year, scientists will begin to

investigate the scattering of W bosons, which has not been possible

with other particle accelerators. Because the new test follows from a

measurement of W boson scattering, it could eventually be performed at

the LHC, according to the authors.

"The beauty of our test is the simplicity of its assumptions,"

explained Grinstein. "The canonical forms of string theory include

three mathematical assumptions - Lorentz invariance (the laws of

physics are the same for all uniformly moving observers), analyticity

(a smoothness criteria for the scattering of high-energy particles

after a collision) and unitarity (all probabilities always add up to

one). Our test sets bounds on these assumptions.

"If the test does not find what the theory predicts about W boson

scattering," he added, "it would be evidence that one of string

theory's key mathematical assumptions is violated. In other words,

string theory - as articulated in its current form - would be proven

impossible."

"If the bounds are satisfied, we would still not know that string

theory is correct," Distler said. "But if the bounds are violated, we

would know that string theory, as it is currently understood, could not

be correct. At the very least, the theory would have to be reshaped in

a highly nontrivial way."

String theory attempts to unify nature's four fundamental forces

- gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak forces

- by positing that everything at the most basic level consists of

strands of energy that vibrate at various rates and in multiple,

undiscovered dimensions. These "strings" produce all known forces and

particles in the universe, thus reconciling Einstein's theory of

general relativity (the large) with quantum mechanics (the small).

Proponents say that string theory is elegant and beautiful. Dissenters

argue that it does not make predictions that can be tested

experimentally, so the theory cannot be proven or falsified. And no

particle accelerator yet exists that can attain the high energies

needed to detect strings. Because of this technical limitation, tests

of string theory have remained elusive until now.

"Since we don't have a complete understanding of string theory, it's

impossible to rule out all possible models that are based on strings.

However, most string theory models are based upon certain mathematical

assumptions, and what we've shown is that such string theories have

some definite predictions that can be tested," Rothstein said.

Reference: http://www.cmu.edu/news/featured_news2.shtml