Theoretical Physicists Develop Test for String Theory

PureInsight | January 28, 2007

Amy Pavlak and Lauren Ward, Carnegie Melon University, and Lee Clippard, University of Texas at Austin

PITTSBURGH - For decades, many scientists have criticized string
theory, pointing out that it does not make predictions by which it can
be tested. Now, researchers at Carnegie Mellon University; the
University of California, San Diego; and The University of Texas at
Austin have developed a test of string theory. Their test, described in
the Jan. 26 Physical Review Letters,
involves measurements of how elusive high-energy particles scatter
during particle collisions. Most physicists believe that collisions
will be observable at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), which is set to
turn on later this year at the European Laboratory for Particle
Physics, commonly known as CERN.

"Our work shows that, in principle, string theory can be tested in a
nontrivial way," explained Ira Rothstein, co-author of the paper and
professor of physics at Carnegie Mellon.

Rothstein and colleagues Jacques Distler, professor of physics at The
University of Texas at Austin; Benjamin Grinstein, professor of physics
at the University of California, San Diego; and Carnegie Mellon
graduate student Rafael Porto developed their test based on studies of
how strongly W bosons scatter in high-energy particle collisions
generated within a particle accelerator. W bosons are special because
they carry a property called the weak force, which provides a
fundamental way for particles to interact with one another.

When the LHC turns on later this year, scientists will begin to
investigate the scattering of W bosons, which has not been possible
with other particle accelerators. Because the new test follows from a
measurement of W boson scattering, it could eventually be performed at
the LHC, according to the authors.

"The beauty of our test is the simplicity of its assumptions,"
explained Grinstein. "The canonical forms of string theory include
three mathematical assumptions - Lorentz invariance (the laws of
physics are the same for all uniformly moving observers), analyticity
(a smoothness criteria for the scattering of high-energy particles
after a collision) and unitarity (all probabilities always add up to
one). Our test sets bounds on these assumptions.

"If the test does not find what the theory predicts about W boson
scattering," he added, "it would be evidence that one of string
theory's key mathematical assumptions is violated. In other words,
string theory - as articulated in its current form - would be proven

"If the bounds are satisfied, we would still not know that string
theory is correct," Distler said. "But if the bounds are violated, we
would know that string theory, as it is currently understood, could not
be correct. At the very least, the theory would have to be reshaped in
a highly nontrivial way."

String theory attempts to unify nature's four fundamental forces 
-  gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak forces 
-  by positing that everything at the most basic level consists of
strands of energy that vibrate at various rates and in multiple,
undiscovered dimensions. These "strings" produce all known forces and
particles in the universe, thus reconciling Einstein's theory of
general relativity (the large) with quantum mechanics (the small).

Proponents say that string theory is elegant and beautiful. Dissenters
argue that it does not make predictions that can be tested
experimentally, so the theory cannot be proven or falsified. And no
particle accelerator yet exists that can attain the high energies
needed to detect strings. Because of this technical limitation, tests
of string theory have remained elusive until now.

"Since we don't have a complete understanding of string theory, it's
impossible to rule out all possible models that are based on strings.
However, most string theory models are based upon certain mathematical
assumptions, and what we've shown is that such string theories have
some definite predictions that can be tested," Rothstein said.


Add new comment